Skip to content
VIPROVE
DE EN

B3 · Proof · Falke plant PoC/Demo

Safety gaps in your machine —
visible before the assessor finds them.

The gap analysis reads the simulated robot plant of the Falke works against ISO 10218-2, ISO 13849 and ISO 13855. Findings with an identifier, sealed.

ISO 10218-2 ISO 13849-1/-2 ISO 13855 PoC/Demo
Falke plant · gap chain

Gaps are not searched. They light up.

The gap analysis reads the simulated plant. The 10 integrity findings hurt most: safety functions with a PL d or SIL 2 demand, implemented on the performance layer, without a safe monitor.

▸ PoC/Demo · Falke plant · the same counts as in the ViTwin app

378 NORM_GAP
9 SYS_GAP
57 OVER_FILL
84 TEST_GAP
10 INTEGRITY_GAP
538 Findings
Open the hall
The plant · Hall 2

The run reads this hall.

Cell 02 assembles wheels, cell 03 labels. The protection zones are computed live: stop at 2.5 m, warning at 3.3 m, monitor at 4.3 m, per ISO 13855. The gap analysis reads this plant. Five kinds of finding, 538 in total.

Open the hall
Cell 02 of the Falke hall, wheel assembly, worker in the protection zone
Cell 02, wheel assembly — worker in the protection zone, protective stop active (STOP 2.5 m · WARN 3.3 m · MONITOR 4.3 m, ISO 13855)
The evidence chain · ISO 13849

From risk assessment to validation.

At cell 02 the chain is concrete: hazard from the worker in the zone, required performance level, protective stop, the three distances, validation. Where a link is missing, the finding lights up.

Risk assessment Safety function Protective equipment Control logic Validation

For example: hazard → required PLr → safety function → safety PLC → sensor & actuator → test

Findings · the five kinds in this run

Five kinds of finding. One sealed package.

NORM_GAP · 378: A clause of ISO 10218-2, ISO 13849 or ISO 13855 is in scope of this plant and has no system proof. Clauses out of scope are not counted.

SYS_GAP · 9: A plant requirement has no software requirement under it that carries it.

OVER_FILL · 57: A software requirement has no plant requirement above it.

TEST_GAP · 84: A requirement of the plant has no test. The proof stops at the document, not at behaviour checked at the cell.

INTEGRITY_GAP · 10: Safety functions with a PL d or SIL 2 demand sit on the performance layer, without a safe monitor. The hall shows the protective stop. The finding says what it does not rest on.

Seal 331b4c3c91b7… · SHA-256 over the sorted findings · no ISO norm texts in the package — identifiers and short paraphrased titles only

Wired up · senses of the twin

Items become edges.

Viprove Graph · View: gap analysis Norm mapping internal · what/why public

Reads

Hall 2: cells, protection zones, safety functions and tests against ISO 10218-2, ISO 13849 and ISO 13855

Transforms

Only in-scope is counted · five kinds of finding, 538 in total

Writes back

538 findings · SHA-256, no norm texts in the package

On AI mapping: an LLM only proposes candidate mappings — the rule engine decides. No LLM in the audit-evidence path.

Honest status.

The sealed run of the Falke plant.

PoC/Demo Falke plant, simulated installation. 378 NORM_GAP, 9 SYS_GAP, 57 OVER_FILL, 84 TEST_GAP, 10 INTEGRITY_GAP, 538 findings sealed. The same counts as in the ViTwin app.
Package Identifiers and short paraphrased titles, SHA-256 over the sorted findings. No ISO norm texts in the package. Not a certificate.